We like ES File Explorer’s multitasking feature but FX File Explorer takes that implementation and betters it by adding a cool split view interface with drag & drop support. Like ES, FX File Explorer lets you open most file types and supports features like gestures, visual clipboard, app management, etc. Firstly, the UI is decent with slight touches of Material Design and one thing we like is the ability to increase/decrease the size of folder previews through pinch to zoom. The file manager app is very similar to ES, both in terms of looks and features. Install: MiXplorer ($4.49 - Play Store)Īnother great ES File Explorer alternative is the popular FX File Explorer.Key Features: No ads, Clean UI, Feature-packed, Supports FTP/SMB, Dual-panel, Cloud integration
#TOTAL COMMANDER ALTERNATIVE FOR FREE#
Keep in mind, MiXplorer is a paid-only app, but you can get it for free through XDA Labs. I would say, if you want a true alternative to ES File Explorer then MiXplorer is the one you should get. It also includes the ability to hide or encrypt files & folders, and like ES, it includes viewers for most file types. It brings most of ES File Explorer’s important features like cloud support, network sharing, Recycle bin, root explorer, compressed file support, etc. Coming from ES’s complicated interface, you will love the easy to use and beautiful Material Design UI on Solid. Solid Explorer is not as popular as ES File Explorer but it certainly is a worthy alternative to it. With that in mind, let’s begin the article. Rest assured, none of the apps mentioned here have Chinese roots.
You can click on the links and move to the corresponding file manager easily. Here, we have enlisted the best replacements to ES File Explorer. With all that said, let’s now go ahead and unpack the list.īest ES File Explorer Alternatives (Updated July 2020) Apart from that, we have also written a dedicated article on the best alternatives of Chinese apps so you can go through that. See Device and sensor overviews.We have carefully curated the list of apps like ES File Explorer that don’t come with bloatware or any other tracking spyware. This also means UWP apps have limited access to devices. See File access and permissions (Windows Runtime apps). For example, you cannot read most of the filesystem, only your installed location, an isolated application data folder, and an isolated temporary file folder. UWP apps can request additional capabilities to get a few more rights with permission from the user, but have limited access to the system and user data. UWP apps have less access rights than "Standard User" and can never run as "Administrator".
#TOTAL COMMANDER ALTERNATIVE WINDOWS#
"Win32 desktop apps" on Windows Vista or later run as "Standard User" or as "Administrator". The UWP platform runs applications in an AppContainer security context. To give you some hints about aspects that should be considered before switching to UWP apps: Security context. I guess I'm a little bit more open minded than you may think. Yes I'm an old school user but also part of a developer team with fresh UI design concepts. I did not talk about modern UI aspects, except that these are often part of personal taste. My question was about the advantage of UWP-apps compared to desktop apps. I know there are a lot of old school people here and if they are not already into it, then my time here is wasted anyway : ) MiloW wrote:I will not start a discussion on pros of a "modern look".
0 kommentar(er)
